Initial diagnosis
Public presence and authorised non-clinical workflow review; a prioritised improvement sheet
We improve your hospital’s information, brand presentation, appointment-enquiry process and feedback handling—so patients get clear information, and management can see the work and the progress.
Not every hospital has all of these. We confirm them through a review and a management discussion before proposing work.
| Possible problem | How we identify it | What we deliver |
|---|---|---|
| The hospital looks and sounds different everywhere | Compare the website, signage, brochures and social profiles | Consistent messaging, templates, approved visual guidelines and patient-information material |
| Patients cannot tell what a department offers | Check each department page for services, availability and the next step | Clear department and service pages, approved FAQs, a service directory and plain language |
| Timings, contact details or location do not match | Cross-check the website against public business profiles | A verified information register, listing corrections and a regular update process |
| Appointment enquiries are not handled consistently | With permission, review enquiry records and the front-desk process | Enquiry ownership, response templates, a pending-request tracker and escalation |
| Bookings happen, but confirmation and rescheduling are unclear | Map the booking-to-attendance process | Confirmation, reminder, cancellation and rescheduling workflow |
| Reviews get replies, but the same complaints repeat | Examine the themes in recent feedback | Approved response drafts, complaint categories, a responsible department and an action tracker |
| Insurance and cashless information is confusing | Verify website information with the authorised hospital team | Current information and a clear assistance process—never a promise of approval or coverage |
| Departments communicate independently | Compare department material, staff information and approvals | A shared information source, department templates and a publication approval workflow |
| Management cannot see what marketing actually delivered | Look at what reports show about work done and enquiry handling | A simple monthly report: work completed, issues fixed, enquiries handled and next priorities |
Scope assumption: One location, up to two departments, an existing editable website and access to the hospital’s approved information and footage.
Public presence and authorised non-clinical workflow review; a prioritised improvement sheet
A one-page communication style sheet and 4 reusable templates (full logo redesign excluded)
Up to 2 existing department pages refreshed and 1 existing contact/appointment form improved
Agreed factual corrections to one eligible location profile; platform approval and ranking are not guaranteed
4 approved informational or educational posts and 2 short video edits from usable supplied footage
One hospital-controlled tracker with owner, status and next-action fields
Acknowledgement, confirmation and rescheduling templates
Up to 20 approved review-response drafts and a recurring-issue tracker
One 45-minute session for the responsible administrative team
A mid-pilot progress review, a final report and a next-step recommendation
Optional—not a required step before the pilot. If you take both, we explain any overlap in work and fees up front.
Diagnostic detailsScope: One location, up to two departments.
Month 1 pilot ₹30,000 + month 2 ₹45,000 + month 3 ₹45,000 = ₹1,20,000 in professional fees for the first quarter.
Months 2 and 3 are approved after the pilot review—there is no upfront three-month commitment. Taxes, software usage, on-site production and external specialist review are quoted separately.
How this differs from the Hospital marketing package (from ₹75,000/month): the package runs search, ads, social and reputation across departments; this programme keeps one location’s information, enquiry process and feedback handling working. Compare all three offer families.
A one-time foundation project: identity, service directory, opening-information material and website.
The 30-day pilot above.
A focused scope on feedback handling and department escalation.
A custom scope for branch-wise information, approvals and reporting.
We reduce the scope—one location, one department, one priority problem—rather than cutting the same package to an unsustainable price.
Rebranding and advertising are not compulsory steps. If your identity already works, we keep it.
You see: An agreed problem statement, responsibilities and work plan
You see: A working pilot and an initial process report
You see: More dependable day-to-day communication
You see: An evidence-backed continue / change / stop recommendation
Targets are set after the baseline—never a promised percentage on an unknown starting point.
| Measure | What is counted |
|---|---|
| Information accuracy | Agreed corrections verified and completed |
| Valid appointment enquiries | Relevant administrative requests, with duplicates and spam removed |
| Response time | A meaningful staff response—not only an automatic acknowledgement |
| Unassigned or pending requests | Requests still without an owner or next action after the agreed time |
| Booking completion | Confirmed appointments, as recorded by the hospital |
| Attendance and rescheduling | The outcome for the same agreed appointment cohort |
| Feedback handling | Issues acknowledged, assigned and resolved by the authorised team |
| Delivery accountability | Work completed, approvals pending, blockers and next decisions |
“35 enquiries have an outcome visibility gap.”
“35 patients were lost.”
An unrecorded outcome is not the same as a lost patient.
Accounts stay hospital-owned with role-based access. Data purpose, retention, deletion and exit handover are documented. Emergency enquiries never enter the marketing response queue.
“Thank you for your feedback. So that the right team can look into your concern, please contact our patient-relations desk at [verified contact]. For privacy reasons we do not discuss individual matters in a public forum.”
Serious clinical allegations go to your authorised medical, patient-relations and legal team—not a marketing executive.
Bed count matters less than these. Large chains can start the same way—one branch, one department.
“We will not start by recommending a full rebrand or expensive advertising. First we examine one location and two departments—information, enquiry handling and feedback. Then we implement defined work for the gaps we verify. At the end of 30 days you have updated assets, a working process, a staff handover and a clear report. Then you decide whether monthly support is useful.”
We do not insist on replacing anyone. We can work alongside your existing content team and solve a defined gap: information accuracy, enquiry handling and reporting.
We will not promise a fixed number of patients. We first understand your capacity, current enquiries and handling baseline, then measure the agreed improvements—such as response time, pending requests and recorded bookings.
Exactly—posts are easy to generate. The value of the fee is approved facts, implementation with your staff, a working enquiry process and accountable reporting.
Yes. Start with one location, one department and one priority problem, or begin with the ₹7,500 standalone diagnostic.
We can share a short public observation note on your hospital and a sample demo. Live implementation is always a defined, paid pilot.
No. Aggregate operational information is usually enough. We keep the marketing tracker minimal and never turn it into a medical-record system; accounts stay hospital-owned with role-based access.
Your authorised medical or legal reviewer approves all public-facing medical communication. Healthcare has ethical limits on patient solicitation and doctor self-promotion, so approval is built into delivery—not added at the end.
Tell us your specialty, city and the problem you want to fix. We review how patients find and reach you today, and reply with a scoped starting point—no obligation.